From Ajzen, A., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. NJ: Prentice-Hall.

 

 

Theory of Reasoned Action

Intention to perform a behavior is a function of attitudes toward engaging in the behavior and perceived normative pressure to perform the behavior.

 

Performing a behavior is a function of intention to perform the behavior.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Attitudes don’t directly predict behavior, they predict intention.

Norms don’t directly predict behavior, they predict intention.

Intention predicts behaviors.

 

Depending on the behavior:

 

Attitudes may have more influence on intention

·        Personally relevant behavior

·        Not very observable behavior

§        What you intend to eat in front of the TV at home

 

Norms may have more influence on intention

·        Socially relevant behavior

·        Highly observable behavior

§        What you intend to eat in front of the in-laws on holiday visit

 


Determinants of Attitudes toward an Act

 

Behavioral Beliefs:

The person’s beliefs that the behavior leads to certain outcomes and his or her evaluations of these outcomes. Attitudes are determined by behavioral beliefs.

 

For any given behavior at a given time, we will have a set of salient beliefs.

 

 

For each belief, we have an outcome evaluation

 

For each belief, we also have a belief strength:

“How certain are you that using birth control pills will cause you to gain weight?

 

 

 

 

An attitude toward a behavior can be predicted this way:

For each belief, the outcome evaluation and belief strength are multiplied.

E.g., gaining weight is “quite bad” (-2), and is “extremely certain (+3), leading to a product of –6.

This is done for each salient belief, and then the products are summed to assess the overall valence (positivity vs. negativity) of the attitude.

 

 

 

So for this person, while the belief about weight gain is very negative and certain, its influence is reduced by the other beliefs that are positive and certain.

 

Implications of this approach:

·        Two people may have the same set of beliefs about a behavior but a totally different attitude

§        Because of different outcome evaluations or belief strengths.

·        A person’s attitude can be changed in several ways

§        Changing what beliefs are salient in a situation

§        Changing evaluations of beliefs

§        Changing strength of belief


 

Intervening to Change Attitudes

 

When intervening with a population, it’s necessary to elicit the beliefs of a sample of the population:

 

Modal salient beliefs: the set of beliefs that are salient in a given population.

Determined through surveys, interviews, focus groups.

 

 


Differences between people who do the desired behavior and people who don’t do it, in beliefs, strength, and outcome, can help guide interventions.

 

 

·        Successful interventions have to assess underlying beliefs and their evaluations and strength, and then work to change these components as necessary

·        Using condoms…

o       Will protect me from HIV

§        This is good (positive outcome evaluation)

§        But I don’t really believe it because nobody I have sex with could have HIV, so it won’t really have an effect on my HIV risk (low certainty)

 

 

 

 

 


Determinants of Subjective Norms

 

Subjective Norm: A person’s belief that most of his or her important others think that she or he should or should not perform that behavior.

 

Referent: specific individual or group who may influence one’s behavior

 

Normative beliefs: belief about what a specific referent person thinks one should or should not do regarding the behavior.

 

For any given behavior at a given time, we will have a set of salient referents.

 

 

For each referent, we have a normative belief: what we think that referent would want us to do:


 

For each referent, we have a specific level of motivation to comply with their wishes for us:

 

A person’s subjective norm is a function of their normative beliefs for salient referents, and motivation to comply with these different referents.

 

 

 

For each referent, the normative belief and motivation to comply are multiplied. Then the product is summed across all referents.

 

Implications of this approach:

·        Two people may have the same set of referents about a behavior but a totally different subjective norm

§        Different normative beliefs or motivations to comply.

 

·        A person’s attitude can be changed in several ways

§        Changing what referents are salient in a situation

§        Changing perceptions of normative beliefs

§        Changing motivation to comply

 

For interventions, normative referents in a population may be determined.

Common approach: change perception of referent’s normative beliefs

 

 

Theory of Reasoned Action

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Before predicting or influencing behavior:

 

Study Attitude toward the Act

·        Determine salient beliefs regarding the behavior

·        Determine outcome evaluation of the beliefs

·        Determine belief strength for each belief

 

Study Subjective Norms

·        Determine salient referents for the behavior

·        Determine normative beliefs for each referent

·        Determine motivation to comply for each referent

 

Use this information in interventions:

 

Two ways:

Empirically test to see what attitudes and norms differentiate performers vs. nonperformers.

 

Specifically address attitudes and norms that affect the behavior in that population.

 


Important Health Behaviors:

 

Never drinking more than two alcoholic beverages in a 24-hour period

Quitting smoking

Avoiding second-hand smoke

Exercising for at least 45 minutes a day

Wearing a face mask to prevent infection from SARS

Breast self-examination once a month in the shower

Testicular self-examination once a month in the shower

Seeing a doctor about a persistent pain in the abdomen


What variables are missing?

 

Fishbein and Ajzen argue that all other variables are “external variables” that operate through attitudes and norms.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

Later on, Ajzen incorporated self-efficacy to create the Theory of Planned Behavior

 

Attitude Toward

The Act or Behavior

 

Subjective Norm Regarding the Act or Behavior

 

Behavior (B)

 

Self-Efficacy Regarding the Act or Behavior

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

The Information – Motivation – Behavioral Skills Model

 

This model incorporates the Theory of Reasoned Action variables, Self-Efficacy, and specific information regarding the behavior:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Behavior is a function of Relevant Information, Motivation, and Behavioral Skills

 

Depending on the behavior, one or more of these components is necessary.